Risk

When a vendor's coverage lapses, the claim lands on you.

Not on them. Without valid additional insured status, a loss caused by somebody else's work goes on your loss run and shows up in your renewal.

Schedule a demoHow tracking works

A single uninsured vendor incident can cost $250K or more.

How the exposure builds

Four steps, none of which anyone decides.

This is a systems failure rather than a judgment failure, which is why training does not fix it.

The lapse is invisible

A policy expires in March. The certificate in your file still reads compliant. Nothing alerts, because nothing is watching the date.

The claim arrives later

Most lapses surface on incident or on audit, and the claim cost lags the lapse by 60 to 180 days. By then the work is finished and the vendor may be gone.

Your policy absorbs it

Without valid additional insured status, the loss goes on your loss run rather than theirs. Your renewal reflects somebody else's negligence.

Endorsement scope decides

Even a current certificate can fail here. Ongoing-operations-only coverage does nothing for a roof that leaks eight months after the repair.

The timing problem

A lapse in March is a claim in September.

The day after the slip-and-fall is the wrong time to discover that the vendor's policy expired last quarter. By then you are reconstructing a file rather than producing one.

  • Coverage expires with no alert to anyone

  • The vendor keeps working, because nothing told them to stop

  • An incident occurs during the uncovered window

  • The claim surfaces 60 to 180 days later

  • Your carrier pays, and your loss history absorbs it

What this figure is not

The $375M+ figure we cite elsewhere is modeled exposure, not money saved.

It multiplies non-compliant vendor count by an incident probability of about 0.5% a year and a default liability per incident. Directional, not actuarial.

The figures that are measured: 283 hours of admin recovered per year, $8,490 in labor, and a 90% COI automation rate.

FAQ

Liability questions

How likely is this really?
Low per vendor per year, which is exactly why it gets deprioritized. The exposure is a volume problem: a few hundred active vendors, each with several policies renewing on their own dates, produces a steady rate of lapses even with a diligent team.
What does an incident actually cost?
A single uninsured vendor incident can cost $250,000 or more in liability. Case-study language from our own operator puts it more bluntly: one uninsured incident could result in multi-million dollar liability landing on the manager's own policies.
What is the $375M figure on your other pages?
It is modeled exposure screened, not claims paid or losses avoided. The method multiplies non-compliant vendor count by an incident probability of roughly 0.5% a year and a default liability per incident. It is directional and we label it that way deliberately.
Is a certificate on file enough?
No. The ACORD 25 says in bold that it confers no rights on the certificate holder. It is a summary prepared by an agent at a moment in time. What secures your position is the endorsement, and that lives in the policy.
What if the vendor cannot afford the coverage we require?
That is the common case with small trades, and it is where most compliance programs stall. IDCore places coverage through InsurePro in the same flow, at roughly $99 per vendor per year, so a non-compliant vendor becomes a cleared vendor instead of a stalled job.

Ask how many of your vendors lapsed last quarter.

If nobody can answer from a system, that is the exposure. We will show you the number in an hour.

Book a demosales@idcorehq.com
Schedule a Demo